[Catalyst] AtomPP implementation question

[D.Murase]

Thanks sri !

I applied following two points into my module,
and uploaded to CPAN (Catalyst-Plugin-AtomPP-0.02).

Thx.

--
Daisuke Murase <typester at cpan.org>


On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 11:11:52 +0200
Sebastian Riedel <sri at oook.de> wrote:

> 
> Am 13.09.2005 um 05:18 schrieb D.Murase:
> 
> >
> > Hi all.
> >
> > I'm writing AtomPP implementation with Catalyst,
> > and wrote this Plugin (attached).
> >
> > Usage is:
> >
> > # call $c->atom in your action
> > sub entry : Local {
> >     my ( $self, $c ) = @_;
> >     $c->atom;
> > }
> >
> > # and then, dispatch to
> > # (create|retrieve|update|delete)_entry methods
> >
> > sub create_entry : Atom {
> >     my ( $self, $c ) = @_;
> >
> >     my $new_entry = $c->req->entry; # XML::Atom object
> >
> >     ...
> > }
> >
> > ---------
> >
> > But I think this implementation may be not elegant :(
> 
> I for one like it, good work!
> 
> Maybe you could make the entry just the first argument and leave  
> Catalyst::Request untouched.
> 
>      sub create_entry : Atom {
>          my ( $self, $c, $entry ) = @_;
>      }
> 
> We also had a long discussion about attributes once when i wrote the  
> xmlrpc plugin, we thought that "Remote" was a better name for through  
> subdispatchers exposed methods.
> 
>      sub create_entry : Remote {
>          my ( $self, $c, $entry ) = @_;
>      }
> 
> 
> --
> sebastian
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Catalyst mailing list
> Catalyst at lists.rawmode.org
> http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst