[Catalyst] AtomPP implementation question

[Sebastian Riedel]

Am 13.09.2005 um 05:18 schrieb D.Murase:

>
> Hi all.
>
> I'm writing AtomPP implementation with Catalyst,
> and wrote this Plugin (attached).
>
> Usage is:
>
> # call $c->atom in your action
> sub entry : Local {
>     my ( $self, $c ) = @_;
>     $c->atom;
> }
>
> # and then, dispatch to
> # (create|retrieve|update|delete)_entry methods
>
> sub create_entry : Atom {
>     my ( $self, $c ) = @_;
>
>     my $new_entry = $c->req->entry; # XML::Atom object
>
>     ...
> }
>
> ---------
>
> But I think this implementation may be not elegant :(

I for one like it, good work!

Maybe you could make the entry just the first argument and leave  
Catalyst::Request untouched.

     sub create_entry : Atom {
         my ( $self, $c, $entry ) = @_;
     }

We also had a long discussion about attributes once when i wrote the  
xmlrpc plugin, we thought that "Remote" was a better name for through  
subdispatchers exposed methods.

     sub create_entry : Remote {
         my ( $self, $c, $entry ) = @_;
     }


--
sebastian