[Catalyst] Standalone Install Package?
Christopher H. Laco
claco at chrislaco.com
Tue Dec 20 14:47:52 CET 2005
Sebastian Riedel wrote:
> Am 20.12.2005 um 05:50 schrieb Kaare Rasmussen:
>>> OK, I've started tinkering. I renamed my site lib directory in my perl
>>> install, and I've started collecting things from 5.61 back needed to run
>>> catalyst.pl/bat and get a test app up and running.
>> If you build such a thing, how about maintaining it?
> Good point!
> We need a build system for this.
Sounds like overkill to me, but I guess it depends on what the goal is
and how many modules we want in a download-and-run version.
Right now, it's simply an extlib directory with all the bits, and a
shell/bat script to point perl/path to it. The extlib directory is just
another @INC path.
I'm toying with the idea of moving from everything in extlib:
use lib 'extlib';
to everything in it's dist dir in extlib, and adding more @INC paths:
use lib 'Catalyst';
use lib 'URI';
IT makes the shell/batch files more complicated, but it makes slogging
in a new version of a dist cleaner.
I probably should put the Catalyst test suite back in so we can test the
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 3178 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://lists.rawmode.org/pipermail/catalyst/attachments/20051220/a7fd1bea/smime.bin
More information about the Catalyst