[Dbix-class] Re: Refactoring Tangram::Expr and
Tangram::Relational::Engine - looking for a SQL AST module
Sam Vilain
sam at vilain.net
Sun Jul 31 05:05:29 CEST 2005
Darren Duncan wrote:
> As a final note, I'm in the middle of another large update across the
> line, so you shouldn't actually start to use Rosetta/SQL::Routine yet
> (though you can start to study it). I plan to post a snapshot tonight
> or tomorrow, with the balance hopefully any day thereafter. This will be
> followed by a list post "Rosetta developer preview #3". Until then,
> Generic doesn't actually connect the dots and implement table create or
> select/update/delete/etc.
Fantastic - feel free to put this project in the utsl.gen.nz subversion
repository, or let us know if you have already found an open repository
where this can go... sharing incremental commits is a great way to merge
minds. Even if you don't give out commit access, at least I can track
it via SVK and send suggestions as easily integrated patches.
Thanks for your other comments on my questions - they all make sense.
Sam.
More information about the Dbix-class
mailing list