[Catalyst] Apache2+fcgid or Lighttpd

[Daniel McBrearty]

I thought of using fcgi also, but wondered if the fact that lighty
doesn't make the fcgi connection persistent was significant.


On 3/15/07, Michele Beltrame <mb at italpro.net> wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I'm about to deploy an application, and this time I can choose to use Lightpd
> instead of Apache+fcgid, which I commonly use. I have no problem with the latter
> configuration, but I was wondering if someone has comments/experience about
> Lighttpd for running Catalyst applications, i.e. speed, memory footprint, etc...
>
> I'm on a VPS environment, so speed can be an import factor for choice.
>
> Thanks,
> Michele.
>
> _______________________________________________
> List: Catalyst at lists.rawmode.org
> Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
> Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.rawmode.org/
> Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
>


-- 
Daniel McBrearty
email : danielmcbrearty at gmail.com
www.engoi.com : the multi - language vocab trainer
BTW : 0873928131