[Catalyst] OT: mod_fastcgi vs. mod_perl (was uri_for() question)

[Daniel McBrearty]

this is a pretty interesting thread. thanks all.


On 3/28/06, Perrin Harkins <perrin at elem.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2006-03-27 at 20:00 -0300, Nilson Santos Figueiredo Junior
> wrote:
> > Well... I'm not really talking about the end-users but about the
> > shared hosting company which wants to offer some sort of application
> > persistence. FastCGI is much more manageable than mod_perl from this
> > POV.
>
> Yeah, shared hosts are probably better off with FastCGI.  SpeedyCGI and
> PPerl are also possible alternatives for people on shared hosts that
> won't do FastCGI.  SpeedyCGI looks kind of abandoned these days though.
>
> - Perrin
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Catalyst mailing list
> Catalyst at lists.rawmode.org
> http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
>



--
Daniel McBrearty
email : danielmcbrearty at gmail.com
www.engoi.com : the multi - language vocab trainer
BTW : 0873928131
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.rawmode.org/pipermail/catalyst/attachments/20060328/cc10e685/attachment.htm