[Catalyst] flamage level considered harmful

[Dominique Quatravaux]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Matt S Trout wrote:

> I think waswas was just getting frustrated because you seemed to be
> asking the same question over and over even after you'd been given
> what seemed to him (and to me) to be an answer that pretty much
> covered your available options.

This is hardly an excuse for bordering rudeness. And I can't see any
reason for *you*, a member of the Catalyst team, to condone this kind
of attitude on the project's list. Unless you want Catalyst to go the
way of so many otherwise excellent open-source project teams who
simply cannot be bothered to market themselves.

> If you want your advice held to professional standards of etiquette
> then you really ought to look for a commercial support/consultancy
> contract;

Yeah, whatever. Or just switch mailing lists, e.g. the mod_perl one is
*way* more user-friendly.

> we have clients for such

You aren't making a good job of marketing your own business, either.
Not to me at least.

> Always remember - asking on a public mailing list is free, if you
> don't like the answer you can have every penny of it back!

No he can't, unless proper apologies are offered.

- --
Dominique QUATRAVAUX                           Ingénieur senior
01 44 42 00 08                                 IDEALX

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFDPRTPMJAKAU3mjcsRAmG1AJ9R2LdZQMa875S+XBIjK1X82Xjd3ACglbu1
i7KPy/qfj9DhCte3pcm+piU=
=VlZn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----