[Catalyst] External FastCGI mode [PATCH]

[David Storrs]

On Oct 31, 2005, at 12:37 AM, Sam Vilain wrote:
> In the interests of interoperability, I think this would be a valuable
> feature for the default FastCGI handler.  However, perhaps it is  
> better
> to leave the current FastCGI engine as-is, and make a new one
> specifically designed for standalone use.
>
> Opinions or criticisms, anyone?


Personally, I would be Least Surprised were this an option on the  
current FastCGI engine.  I would be unpleasantly surprised if it were  
a standalone engine.  So, I vote with you; make it an option.

--Dks
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.rawmode.org/pipermail/catalyst/attachments/20051031/f84d32df/attachment.htm