[Catalyst] Clash of the plugins: SubRequest vs Static::Simple

[Johan Lindström]

At 00:29 2005-10-05, Andy Grundman wrote:
>I'll try to duplicate this and write a failing test for 
>Static::Simple.  Just looking at the code, I can't see anything wrong, though.

Attached is a simple Cat project that demonstrates the behaviour (note: 
Windows newlines).

perl script\smurf_test.pl /bar/baz
[just outputs text]
...
in Bar::baz

perl script\smurf_test.pl /bar/foo
[calls /bar/baz as a subrequest and outputs some text with the result]
...
in Bar::foo with subreq: (in Bar::baz)

If you edit Smurf.pm and add the Static::Simple, you get this instead:
in Bar::foo with subreq: ()

And if you'll trace after the breakpoint you'll see how Smurf::dispatch() 
is never called.


/J
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Smurf.zip
Type: application/zip
Size: 7212 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.rawmode.org/pipermail/catalyst/attachments/20051005/213c82a9/Smurf.zip