[Catalyst] Why Catalyst instead of Ruby on Rails?
Sebastian Riedel
sri at oook.de
Sat Nov 12 02:55:22 CET 2005
Am 12.11.2005 um 01:34 schrieb Philip Edelbrock:
> Oh, a couple other little observations: There are some medium to
> largish sites out there in Rails (the project I'm on could
> conceivably be the largest to date when it launches?), but watch
> out for the argument that (large site) Basecamp is written in Rails
> and therefore other large sites can also be done in Rails.
> Basecamp wasn't written in Rails, Rails was written from what came
> out of Basecamp.
Yes, our list only includes small - middle sized apps, i know of much
bigger ones, but had to promise not to publish any details.
Sadly it's still very common that companies (especially in financial
business) don't talk about their Perl use. :(
--
sebastian
More information about the Catalyst
mailing list