[Catalyst] POD patches or internals section in the wiki ?

[Dominique Quatravaux]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


>> [...] I hope that my feedback is helping to make the docs for
>> Catalyst as good as the framework itself.
>
>
Andreas Marienborg wrote:

> That, I believe, is the goal of a lot of people :)

Speaking of which, is it OK if I submit sketchy, unfinished POD
patches on whatever I manage to grok about Catalyst's various modules
and subs? Or would my efforts be more productively spent contributing
to a new "internals" section in the Wiki ?

I guess the answer depends a lot on the expected final look of the
documentation (more like a standard POD treatise or more like a book).
I respectfully submit that I prefer the built-in docs to be of the
former kind (I can buy a book as a side help but I need a searchable
reference manual).

- --
Dominique QUATRAVAUX                           Ingénieur senior
01 44 42 00 08                                 IDEALX

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFDtSgpMJAKAU3mjcsRAlXcAJ4yBOX25Cij0lYm6SI3IuEwHAIbvACgnaQx
gJQK/9v0mYT64Jpp4Tv5IDw=
=s4Yo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----