[Catalyst] RFC: HTTP 500 status for errors

[Michael Richards]

On 12/6/05, Matt S Trout <dbix-class at trout.me.uk> wrote:
>
>
> Provided we don't inflict IE error screens on unsuspecting users instead
> of something useful, I'm all in favour of a 500 for the status code; it's
> meant as a signal to the machine, not the user, so keeping to the standard
> is the better path.
>

As long as the output is more than 512 bytes the "helpful" IE error message
screen will not be an issue.

Michael
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.rawmode.org/pipermail/catalyst/attachments/20051206/2431d2a4/attachment.htm