[Catalyst] Bing!
Matt S Trout
dbix-class at trout.me.uk
Fri Aug 12 20:43:40 CEST 2005
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 02:32:19PM +0200, Sebastian Riedel wrote:
>
> Am 11.08.2005 um 05:56 schrieb Randall Marbach:
>
> >Those dang Java and GoF Guys... maybe its time for a
> >twist on the MVC pattern ( ala TIMTOWTDI).. we need a
> >MVCR pattern where R is rules, or possibly MVCP where
> >P is Process, such as in BPEL4WS, which is a XML
> >Language for orchestrating a bunch of business
> >processes, rules, etc, independant of UI,presentation
> >or persistance issues.
BPEL4WS is overhyped, over-specced and patent encumbered. Forget it. W3C's
WSCI is the same thing but without the encumbrance, so still not vastly
useful.
> I couldn't disagree more, the one key argument that makes Rails and
> Catalyst so successful is that they stick to one language.
> Look why most people hate Java frameworks and switch to Rails, it's
> the XML nightmares.
Yeah. OTOH, all a process/workflow really is is an event driven state machine.
Hmm ... Catalyst::Controller::POE::NFA, anybody?
--
Matt S Trout Website: http://www.shadowcatsystems.co.uk
Technical Director E-mail: mst (at) shadowcatsystems.co.uk
Shadowcat Systems Ltd.
+ Help us build a better perl ORM: http://dbix-class.shadowcatsystems.co.uk/ +
More information about the Catalyst
mailing list